GEORGE P BUSH AND THE CITY OF SAN ANTONIO TO PLACE A STATUE OF SANTA ANNA AT THE ALAMO

IS THE CITY OF SAN ANTONIO GOING TO PLACE A STATUE OF SANTA ANNA AT THE ALAMO?

12/11/2019

Dec 11, 2019

   Texans won a temporary delay on Wednesday, December 4, when, at the San Antonio Historic Design and Review Commission meeting. The HDRC reversed themselves and voted 8 to 3 against granting the Building Permit for the removal of the Alamo Cenotaph. The temporary victory was won thanks to Tap Pilam Coahuiltecan Nation. Tap Pilam is seeking for the site to be considered as an official cemetery and to be formally recognized as descendants of Native Americans who lived at the former Spanish colonial mission before it played a key role in the Texas Revolution. This was the first time Texans have been able to get any city or state bureaucracy to side with the people in over two years. There is another HDRC meeting coming up next week Dec 18, 2019 and you can rest assure that D1 City Councilman Roberto Trevino, Mayor Nirenberg, George P Bush and others will be applying pressure on them. Just this past week, not even two days after the Dec 4, 2019 HDRC meeting, TITFF spotted 2 commissioners coming out of the Alamo CEO Douglas McDonald's office. We all know what that was.....pressure. Also last week TITFF spotted 3 contractors at the cenotaph looking at blueprints and examining the Alamo Cenotaph. They intend to move the cenotaph in the very near future, but that is another conversation we will have soon.

      The question that everyone is asking is "Will the city of San Antonio and the GLO erect a monument to Santa Anna on the Alamo"? Mayor Ron Nirenberg is quoted on the Trey Ware show, Sept 12, 2018. saying " I think everyone who shed blood in the defense of liberty and the things that they believe in, on both sides, ought to be honored, and that's exactly what the intent of this redevelopment plan is". Also back in early 2018 D1 Councilman Roberto Trevino talked about honoring both sides at one of the Alamo Meetings. Then to put the cherry on top the "Experts" at the Dec 4, 2019 HDRC meeting talked about placing a marker or something to that effect where the Mexican Army stood. So in light of everything we have heard, what are Texans suppose to think? Just today George P Bush tweeted about this issue saying...

" One must ask themselves, why am I being accused of honoring the murderous dictator Santa Anna? Is it because my mother (now a naturalized citizen) is from Mexico? I was born in Houston, my wife is from San Angelo, and my boys were born-you guessed it in Texas. As a United States Navy Veteran, who deployed to Afghanistan, I know exactly what it means to be loyal to the American Flag, this country and this great state. The idea that I would EVER place a statue of Santa Anna at the Alamo is patently false. Enough is enough. This is an outright lie, and quite frankly, flat out racist."

We are not sure why he brought the race card into his comment, unless he is getting desperate. TITFF has never said that George P Bush wanted to erect a statue of Santa Anna, but the City of San Antonio is quoted (Nirenberg's quote above) as saying some things that raise a lot of Texas eyebrows. The lack of communication on the reimagine the Alamo Plan from George P Bush, combined with the fact that the City of San Antonio & George P Bush have ignored all of Texan's concerns, is the reason many don't trust any of them.

This Is Texas Freedom Force has never advocated for the removal of a historical monument, because we believe in protecting all history, but if the City of San Antonio & George P Bush erect a monument to Santa Anna you can guarantee we will be the first to step up and remove it!

Source

Sept 12 Trey Ware Show

6 Comments

Ramon Garza

12/11/2019 07:03:56 pm

He needs to be booted out!!

Lamar Henry

12/11/2019 07:42:39 pm

Looks good! Great info. It should be noted, for everything it is worth, that the two co-signers of the disgraceful "Alamo Master Plan" was mayor Ron Nirenberg and YEP--George P Bush!

Luke

12/11/2019 08:14:12 pm

If his name is on it, it's his baby whether he likes it or not. It's a little late for him to disown it now.

Tom Longmire

12/12/2019 08:04:03 am

"Honoring both sides .." That is how Civil War monuments were viewed … until recently! How about honoring the South, who were "fighting for their freedom" (independence) from tyranny and leave 100+ year old monuments alone.

The difference between the Alamo and the Civil War is that "both sides" of the Civil War are United States veterans!

Sheldon link

12/12/2019 10:16:33 am

Changing our history is another socialist and globalist act to dilute our history and marginalize our state and country.

Stop messing with our history!

Jerry Carlow

12/12/2019 01:03:03 pm

Comment:

"Progressive" [toward destruction of the Constitution (as usual)] advocacy is AGAIN "meddling with" history and culture in a perverse and destructive way that will seek to disrupt rational understanding of history and long-established values (in order to FURTHER devalue the meaning of past events as is not uncommon with socialism-advocating non-conservative "liberals").

As I recall, the heroes of the Alamo were fighting against suppression of rights that Texans were fighting to protect from being taken away from them by Dictator Santa Anna, President of Mexico. Hence a "revolution" against unfair repression that Santa Anna was orchestrating was begun by citizen leaders in Texas. The Alamo (and ALL reconstruction and monuments) were instituted and erected to commemorate Texans suffering from Santa Anna's oppression, and to CELEBRATE victory over this oppressor and his armies.

Santa Anna (and thus Mexico) was the eventual loser in this war, and TEXANS at the Alamo, Goliad, and San Jacinto have ACCURATELY been celebrated as the victors who won INDEPENDENCE from Mexico.

Perhaps those wanting to honor Santa Anna and in effect DEMOLISH Dr. Coppini's monumental sculpture (intended [by him and MANY others) to be an ONGOING PERPETUAL REMINDER of "what really happened here" and how significant were the contributions of the "defenders" of the Alamo) have anticipated it being "warehoused" but NOT "RELOCATED" but eventually DESTROYED (in an "uh-oh, it was an accident" INTENDED "vandalism" incident) NEVER to be RE-ERECTED AGAIN, because it was deemed as "politically incorrect" by those who actually HATE the meaning that Dr. Coppini communicated in this monument. [Pompeo Luigi Coppini (May 19, 1870 – September 26, 1957) was an Italian born sculptor who emigrated to the United States becoming a citizen and living in San Antonio until his death, becoming a significant historical figure himself, having authored MANY monuments and sculptures throughout Texas, and the United States].

I suggest to those who would seek to ADD Santa Anna's sculpture to the Alamo "sacred grounds," are actually ALSO THE SAME ONES motivated to remove the Alamo Cenotaph, and in planning on "transitionally" "warehousing it" are PRETENDING to want to "re-errect" it at a less conspicuous spot in San Antonio [not as a fully-ready-for-re-erection historic artifact, but as as broken junk sculpture in the "marble junkyard" from which aspiring "liberal, (pro-socialist) aspiring sculptors could be encouraged to acquire large chunks of marble to sculpt their large images of Che Guevara, and OTHER Communist and socialist leaders (whose STRONG-HAND-RULE resulted in the "death-by-firing-squad MURDER of millions who WOULD NOT SUBMIT to their "leadership authority" after they had "seduced and deceived these MILLIONS" into believing their promises of "free everything" for "Comrade Everyone"). Murder and execution are the ALWAYS "outcome" of accepting socialism, (which soon evolves into "Socialist Communism") but which AT FIRST is disguised as a BETTER alternative to that awful "unfair" "CAPITALISM" which they typically have been taught to MISPERCEVE by socialist-infiltrated educators who have "guided" students for YEARS away from knowing HOW to rationally evaluate social and political matters with "fair-headedness" and reasonable "rationality."

For those who desire to place Santa Anna's sculpture upon the grounds of the Alamo, I suggest you FIRST "TEST THE WATERS" and PROPOSE to place a sculpture of Adolph Hitler in the WORLD WAR II ME MEMORIAL in Washington, DC, in order to see HOW HIGH that "lead Balloon will fly'! THEN, PROPOSE MOVING the WWII Memorial (in its entirety) to Baltimore, (and see) how well that 'SUGGESTION' of "RELOCATING IT" 'GOES OVER'!

THERE are MANY similar FORMS of such SOCIAL and POLITICAL "INSANITY" being offered to NOT ONLY San Antonio, BUT ALSO to MANY OTHER communities by a substantial number of "nut-case 'liberals'" who have serupticiously "infiltrated" and INFLUENCED uninforned citizens and MISGUIDED students toward ACCEPTING MANY "NUT-CASE"-insanely-STUPID-and-IMPRACTICAL IDEAS!

PLACING a statue of Santa Anna and REMOVING the Historical ALAMO CENOTAPH from the ALAMO GROUNDS AREA are just TWO of these politically and socially insane IDEAS that NEED TO BE TOTALLY "flushed" ONCE AND FOR ALL!

BY THE WAY, anyone stupidly foolish enough to seek to memorialize Adolph Hitler in Bronze or Marble in the DC WWII Memorial, are WELCOME TO JOIN those seeking to add Santa Anna's bust or full sculpture to the Alamo, AND "RELOCATE" (or remove) the Coppini-sculpted Cenotaph from the Alamo Memorial Grounds!...they are ALL of the same "stripe." BOTH of these types need "help," but NOT of the type they PRESUME!

Article:

IS THE CITY OF SAN ANTONIO GOING TO PLACE A STATUE OF SANTA ANNA AT THE ALAMO?
12/11/2019

https://www.txfreedomforce.org/titff-news/george-p-bush-and-the-city-of-san-antonio-to-place-a-statue-of-santa-anna-at-the-a

TITFF NEWS

IS THE CITY OF SAN ANTONIO GOING TO PLACE A STATUE OF SANTA ANNA AT THE ALAMO?

Leave a Reply.

Authors

Archives

Links